Introduction
Pleomorphism is basically the concept that cells,
and especially one-celled microorganisms, can change form under certain
conditions to cells of another type. For example an example of pleomorphism
in human cells might be the morphing of skin cells to connective tissue cells,
or of blood cells to bone tissue. In the field of microbiology, the
concept primarily implies that bacteria of one species might change to bactera
of another species under certain conditions. For example, this theory
might allow that under certain environmental conditions, a typhoid bacillus
could morph into a staphylococcus bacteria.
In the alternative healing world, and on
the fringes of conventional mainstream science, there are those who feel that
pleomorphism of mircoorganisms is widespread, and that such pleomorphism is
how nature performs various tasks of toxin cleanup and tissue removal in
the human body. In effect, this theory states that bacteria simply change
to whatever form is most handily needed in the body, based upon cues from
the body itself. Indeed, in the many parallel theories of biological
terrain assessment and adjustment, the underlying assumption is that
"infection" by microorganism really indicates
nothing more than imbalances in the inner biochemical terrain of the body,
and that if the inner terrain of the body is allowed to normalize, then the
"infectious organisms" will cese their inflammatory activity, as their presence
is no longer needed, as determined by the interior milieu.
In these models, bacteria and other microogranism
are not seen as dangerous, invasive or pathogenic, nor infectious, but rather
as simply responding to cues from the body that cleanup is needed.
In other words, they are seen as performing simply necessary cleanup functions
in response to cues from the local body tissues. So, in these models,
bacteria are not seen as pathogenic or aggressive, but rather, inner biological
terrain, the interior mileiu of the body, is seen as the chief determinant
of the presence or absence of certain "infectious" processes. Therefore,
in these particular pleomorphic models, the interior milieu, or inner terrain,
is seen as having primacy in determining presence or absence of "diseases"
due to microorganisms. Thus, it would make sense that one would treat
an infectious illness by simply adjusting the inner terrain of the body
to allow it to become more healthful, thus eliminating the need for the presence
of the "infectious" organisms. Conversely, any attempt to treat an infectious
illness with antibiotics (or hydrogen peroxide, ozone or colloidal silver,
all of which are favorite armamentaria in the alternative healing world)
or other "aggressive" means would be seen in most cases as short-sighted and
merely cosmetic, as the practitioner would be attempting to treat a symptom
of a deep imbalance, rather than addressing the deep imbalance. Further, these
theories would suggest that most, if not all, antibiotics and other aggressive
antimicrobial means would actually further imbalance and disrupt the inner
terrain, thus eventually leading to further degeneration.
A number of theorists and practitioners in
the raw foods world, among many other fields of natural healing as well, seem
to also subscribe to theories which dictate the primacy of biological terrain.
Thus, in treating illnesses which seem to be of microbiological origin, they
would favor simply correcting the inner terrain via dietary modification
and other simple means. Many people in the raw foods world, for example,
believe that the primary reason for the many health benefits derived from
a raw foods diet is simply improvement in inner biological terrain.
This improvement in inner terrain is seen as due to the fact that the person
has ceased intake of toxic foods and rather increased intake of truly healthful
and nurturing foods, thus allowing the body to naturally improve its inner
terrain.
I have often fielded private inquiries recently
from list members seeking more information on pleomorphism, particularly where
to find further info on this theory, and I realized this morning that I should
probably post my recent replies to those folks on the list as well!
So here are some thoughts on where to find more information on pleomorphism!
Off the top of my head right now, here are
a few references on general pleomorphism of bacteria:
Beauchamp and Pasteur
Beauchamp, a contemporary of Pasteur's, differed
with Pasteur on a number of theoretical models. Whereas Pasteur felt
that bacteria were the "all" (primary and sufficient cause) in causing illness,
Beauchamp felt that the inner terrain (biological terrain, or interior milieu)
was far more important in determining whether illness manifested or not.
Incidentally, on this point, noted philosopher Douglas Humer reports in his
excellent book on the subject that Pasteur capitulated on his deathbed, admitting
that terrain ruled.
They also differed, as mentioned above, on
pleomprhism: Pasteur felt that it was impossible, and that bacteria existed
in numerous and separate strains or species, while Beauchamp and his allies
felt that bacteria are really one big family, and that a bacteria (e.g., salmonella)
can revert back to a primitive prototype bacteria, which can then re-differentiate
into a different type of bacteria altogether (perhaps an e. coli species
or typhus). This is not so weird as it sounds: it is wel-known in modern
conventional scientific circles that cells in the human body, under the proper
influence (hormonal, electrical fields) can revert back to primitive cells
and then re-differentiate into a different type of specialized tissue cell.
Robert O. Becker, MD, did a lot of work on this in the 70s and 80s, and it
is recounted in his books on electric fields and human
health.
Royal Rife and His Colleagues in the
Early 1900's
Dr. Royal R. Rife, the developer of the Rife
microscope back in the 1930's and the inventor of the Rife Ray Beam Ray plasma
healing device (back in the 1930's and 1940's) was very much a believer in
pleomorphism and claimed to have seen ample evidence of such under his microscope.
He was rather closely allied with some mainstream East Coast academic bacteriological
researchers (Dr. Arthur Kendall, at Rockefeller Institute) at that time
who were pushing pleo big time until the bio establishment backlashed against
them and they literally went into hiding!
If you were to get hold of a copy of the book
by investigative reporter Barry Lynes about Rife and his work (called "The
Cancer Cure that Worked"), he has about two chapters loosely devoted to Rife's
involvement with pleo theory. Lyne's book is available almost anywhere,
including many vendors on the Web,for about $10.
Next, if you were to do a search on "Royal
Rife" and microscope, you would come across many Web articles on Rife, many
of which touch on his pleo theories. Funny thing, the biggest
thing he took heat about from the bio establishment was his pleo theories,
and not his weird microscope! Beware if you do a search on Rife alone
(no microscope), as there are thousands of web pages devoted to the Rife Ray
Beam device , which will lead you a bit off-topic! Incidentally, I
happen to have 3 modern ones in my labs -- many folks claim that they reverse
Lyme disease and cataracts, as well as many other things, in weeks; lots of
folks use them for cancer, which scares me, since most of them are not making
dietary changes as well!
Modern Bacteriology and Pleomorphism
Incidentally, since Kendall's time, and the
terrible political attacks upon him for his pleo models, pleomorphism has
become much more accepted in mainstream microbiology since 1960. Numerous
well-known and reptuable scientists have confirmed the basics of pleomorphism,
as well as documented specific cases of pleomorphism in a number of different
species of bacteria. The related issue of the primacy of bacterial determinism
in illness versus primacy of biological terrain is more disupted, because
of the tremendous ripple effect which the acceptance of biological terrain
as causative would have on the pharmaceutical industry and food industry,
as well as the repuation of many leading biochemists.
As an example of modern scientific acceptance
of pleo, two French biologists (Sonea and Panisset) published a book in the
early 1980's entitled "A New Bacteriology", which contended that bacterial
pleo was now proven scientific knowledge, and they cited numerous articles
from various fields to support this contention.
Web Resources
There are also quite a few web pages devoted
to pleomorphism, if you were to search on that word! However, if you
do a web search on the word, you might also want to include "bacteria" or
"microorganism" as another search term. Why? Folks in the medical community,
especially oncologists and pathologists, sometimes uses the word "pleomorphism"
in a different sense: to indicate highly variable cell nuclei in cancerous
or pre-cancerous human tissue cells.
Two of the best web pages I have found on
pleo are:
Chris Bird
The latter link above contains a reprint of
the late Christopher Bird's article in Nexus magazine in the early 1990s on
THE MYSTERY OF PLEOMORPHIC MICROBIAL ORGANISMS.
Herr Professor Doctor Enderlein
Lastly, there is also a German medical doctor,
Herr Professor Doctor Gunther Enderlein, who was a microbiologist and researcher
who studied live blood for more than 40 years. He wrote over 300 articles
and published a compilation of some of his work in 1925 in a book entitled
"Bacteria Cyclogeny", now available in English. Dr. Enderlein died in
1968. A few of his articles were published in "Explore! for the Professional"
journal over the pastt 10 years on pleomorphism and related topics. Indeed,
a few were also on iridology, but his iridology articles tend to lose me!
I have his articles from "Explore! for the Professional" somewhere,
but you can go to some web sites on Enderlein's work, at:
I wish to thank Dr Kirk Slagel, the Medical
Education Director for Pleomorphic Products SANUM, for providing me with
much-needed additional background information about Dr. Gunther Enderlein.
Alleged Human Macro-Scale Pleomporhism
You didn't thinks I was going to let this pass
without at least a mention, did you? It seems that there are some humans,
many of them authors and lecturers who make lots of money by claiming this
and other outlandish things, who contend that animals and humans can shapeshift
at will (e.g., human to eagle and back, human to coyote to owl to fish to
dog and back), and I guess, in all fairness, that this is an example of a
type of deliberate individual pleomorphism. One of the foremost authors
in this field, some guy with a PhD in something, teaches a course at Esalen
Institute (Big Sur) each year on deliberate shapeshifting, and claims that
he has done it himself (human to animal and back) several times.
There are also many folks who believe that
a specialized deviant race of near-immortal humans, usually called "the Athanor",
many of whom are shapeshifters, live among us undetected! Then we could
get into the mystical masters who claim that they have immortal bodies,
and have been alive for hundreds or thousands of years, and can materialize
orde-materialize their bodies at will! But,
I think that is straying too far afield!
Secondly, regarding shapeshifting, a true
but trivial story. When I was in the corporate
world as a director of a large team, I developed
a casual friendship with a young man on another nearby team; we worked together
on certain projects. He was rather overweight, and he felt that this
issue was interfering with his self-esteem, as he weighed over 360 lbs.
and was about 6 feet tall. I therefore lobbied his boss in an attempt
to get the company to pay for him to attend the shapeshifting course at Esalen
Institute, arguing that if he could shapeshift at will into a slim, trim,
buff guy then it would help his self esteem and his work productivity!
He liked the idea and was willing to attend, but his rather mainstream immediate
boss (my peer) would not authorize the expenditure, despite being given a
photocopy of the catalog course description, which warranted that when the
course was over, he would be able to shapeshift at will! I also envisioned
that a shapshifter might have other advantages as well in corporate environment!
Imagine! You could turn into an owl or a hawk in the middle of a boring
meeting, and take a shit on everyone!